CO129-274 - Public Offices & Others - 1896 — Page 430

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

424

2. The last grave irregularity charged against the Registrar "the use of postage stamps for judicial documents and irregularities in connection therewith". No law has prescribed the use of stamps for these fees - Sect: 16 of Ord: "No. 3 of 1858 says: "Crown fees and costs are payable in current dollars.

I believe a Government order directed them to be paid in stamps and since then the Registrar has every week indented on the Treasurer, on a form prescribed for that purpose, for stamps. He has been obliged to take what the Treasurer has sent him back. On several occasions I asked Mr. Lister the Treasurer to give us judicial stamps and Mr. Sangster when Acting Registrar has more than once made a similar request. It has been refused on the ground that the revenue derived from these fees did not justify the expense and trouble which the method of separate judicial stamps would involve.

Cancelling the stamps in the Registry is perfectly efficient and has satisfied the requirements of the Audits for years. If it had been deficient Mr. Micolle the Somerset House local auditor would very soon have called attention to its defects.

29. With regard to the removal of certain stamps of small value from some old documents in summary suits, Mr. Sangster confirms what the Acting Chief Justice suggests, that most likely this was done by or on behalf of some ardent postage stamp collector. He says these stamps were on old documents, had been audited and passed several years ago, and could be of no possible use to anyone except as specimens. He says he called my attention to it.

-10-

Edit History

2026-05-28 11:09:24 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
424 2. The last grave irregularity charged against the Registrar "the use of postage stamps for judicial documents and irregularities in connection therewith". No law has prescribed the use of stamps for these fees - Sect: 16 of Ord: "No. 3 of 1858 says: "Crown fees and costs are payable in current dollars. I believe a Government order directed them to be paid in stamps and since then the Registrar has every week indented on the Treasurer, on a form prescribed for that purpose, for stamps. He has been obliged to take what the Treasurer has sent him back. On several occasions I asked Mr. Lister the Treasurer to give us judicial stamps and Mr. Sangster when Acting Registrar has more than once made a similar request. It has been refused on the ground that the revenue derived from these fees did not justify the expense and trouble which the method of separate judicial stamps would involve. Cancelling the stamps in the Registry is perfectly efficient and has satisfied the requirements of the Audits for years. If it had been deficient Mr. Micolle the Somerset House local auditor would very soon have called attention to its defects. 29. With regard to the removal of certain stamps of small value from some old documents in summary suits, Mr. Sangster confirms what the Acting Chief Justice suggests, that most likely this was done by or on behalf of some ardent postage stamp collector. He says these stamps were on old documents, had been audited and passed several years ago, and could be of no possible use to anyone except as specimens. He says he called my attention to it. -10-
Baseline (Original)
10 424 2. The last grave irregularity charged against the Registrar "the use of postage stamps for judicial documents and irregularities in con ection therewith". No law has prescribed the use of stamps for these fees - Sect: 16 of ord: "o. 3 of 1858 says: "Crown fees and costs are payable in current dollars. I believe a Government order directed them to be paid in stamps and since then the Registrar has every week indented on the Treasurer, on a form prescribed, for that purpose, for stamps. He has been obliged to take what the Treasurer has sent him back. On several occasions I asked Mr. Lister the Treasurer to give us judicial stamps and r. Sangster when Acting Registrar has more than once made a similar request. It has been refused on the ground that the revenue derived from these fees did not justify the expense and trouble which The method of separate judicial stamps would involve. cancelling the stamps in the Registry is perfectly efficient and has satisfied the requirements of the Audits for years if it had been deficient Mr. Micolle the Somerset House local auditor would very soon have called attention to its defects. 29. With regard to the removal of certain stamps of small value from some old documents in summary suits. Mr. Sangster confirms what the Acting Chief Justice Sugges Suggests biz ys that most likely this was done by or on behalf of some ardent postage stamp collector. He says these stamps were on old documents, had been audited and passed several years ago, and could be of no possible use to He says he called my any one except as specimens. etention to it. -10-
2026-05-28 11:09:24 · Baseline
View content

10

424

2. The last grave irregularity charged against the

Registrar "the use of postage stamps for judicial

documents and irregularities in con ection therewith".

No law has prescribed the use of stamps for these

fees - Sect: 16 of ord: "o. 3 of 1858 says:

"Crown fees and costs are payable in current

dollars.

I believe a Government order directed them to be

paid in stamps and since then the Registrar has every

week indented on the Treasurer, on a form prescribed,

for that purpose, for stamps. He has been obliged to

take what the Treasurer has sent him back. On several

occasions I asked Mr. Lister the Treasurer to give us

judicial stamps and r. Sangster when Acting Registrar

has more than once made a similar request. It has

been refused on the ground that the revenue derived from

these fees did not justify the expense and trouble which

The method of separate judicial stamps would involve.

cancelling the stamps in the Registry is perfectly

efficient and has satisfied the requirements of

the

Audits for years if it had been deficient

Mr. Micolle the Somerset House local auditor would

very soon have called attention to its defects.

29. With regard to the removal of certain stamps of

small value from some old documents in summary suits.

Mr. Sangster confirms what the Acting Chief Justice

Sugges

Suggests biz

ys that most likely this was done by or on behalf

of some ardent postage stamp collector.

He says these

stamps were on old documents, had been audited and passed

several years ago, and could be of no possible use to

He says he called my

any one except as specimens.

etention to it.

-10-

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.